In a dig at his uncle and NCP founder Sharad Pawar, Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar said he did not get a political opportunity as he is not his son.
In Short
- Ajit Pawar believes political opportunity should be given to new people after 80
- He criticises uncle Sharad Pawar’s indecisiveness over his faction’s alliance with BJP
- Ajit Pawar, along with 8 MLAs, joined the BJP government, causing split in NCP
Ajit Pawar, Maharashtra’s Deputy Chief Minister, has made pointed remarks directed at his uncle and NCP founder, Sharad Pawar, suggesting nepotism in political opportunities within the party.
Speaking at a rally in Shirur, Pune district, Ajit Pawar asserted that his lack of familial ties to Sharad Pawar has hindered his access to political opportunities, insinuating favoritism within the NCP hierarchy.
Addressing the audience, Ajit Pawar expressed frustration over the perceived lack of opportunities for individuals not directly related to Sharad Pawar.
He emphasized the need for new leadership, particularly after the age of 80, indicating a desire for fresh faces in political roles.
Additionally, Ajit Pawar responded to Sharad Pawar’s recent statement regarding discussions with the BJP, acknowledging the existence of talks while also expressing his presence during those discussions.
His comments shed light on the internal dynamics of the NCP, particularly concerning its relationship with other political parties.
Furthermore, Ajit Pawar criticized BJP leader Chandrakant Patil for his previous remarks about defeating Sharad Pawar, asserting that such statements were unwarranted and urging Patil to focus on his party’s efforts in Pune while leaving Baramati to Ajit Pawar and his supporters.
The political backdrop of Ajit Pawar’s remarks is significant, especially considering his wife’s recent candidacy in the Lok Sabha elections against Sharad Pawar’s daughter, Supriya Sule, in Baramati, a longstanding stronghold of the Pawar family.
Moreover, Ajit Pawar highlighted his contributions to Pune’s development, citing examples such as bringing the district cooperative bank and Pimpri-Chinchwad Municipal Corporation under the NCP’s control.
Responding to Sharad Pawar’s statements about potential alliances with the Congress, Ajit Pawar expressed skepticism, suggesting that such remarks were intended to sow confusion.
He also downplayed the likelihood of Uddhav Thackeray merging the Shiv Sena with the Congress, citing his firsthand experience with Thackeray’s leadership during the Maha Vikas Aghadi government.
In conclusion, Ajit Pawar’s remarks underscore the internal dynamics and power struggles within the NCP, shedding light on familial ties and political ambitions within the party’s leadership.