Newsmatro
U.S. federal wildland firefighters are bracing for a potential significant pay reduction this autumn, as a partisan standoff among Republicans in Congress over federal spending looms. Lawmakers in Washington warn that this feud could lead to a mass exodus among these dedicated firefighters, thereby jeopardizing the firefighting efforts in 16 states across the country, primarily in the West and Southwest regions. With over 16,600 firefighters currently battling more than 90 large fires, spanning nearly 630,000 acres, the consequences could be dire. Additionally, adverse effects from recent blazes in Hawaii and Canada’s British Columbia only exacerbate the urgency of resolving this pay dispute.
Representative Mike Simpson, a Republican from Idaho, who chairs the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies, expressed concern over the potential 50% pay cut faced by these heroic firefighters. He emphasized the dedication of these professionals who risk their lives fighting wildfires, underscoring the risk of them walking off the job if their salaries are significantly reduced. Presently, the federal government employs around 18,700 wildland firefighters, and both Republicans and Democrats in Congress acknowledge that failure to safeguard their pay could lead to a detrimental ripple effect, particularly when climate change has intensified the frequency and severity of wildfires.
The current debate revolves around Democratic President Joe Biden’s request for $60 million in supplemental funding, aiming to protect the pay of federal wildland firefighters until December. This proposal hinges upon Congress avoiding a government shutdown as the current funding expires on September 30. President Biden had already raised the minimum wage for wildland firefighters to $15 per hour in 2021. Furthermore, the bipartisan infrastructure bill, signed into law by the President, granted additional annual pay raises of $20,000 or 50% of a firefighter’s base pay, whichever is smaller. However, these pay hikes are set to lapse by the end of September.
Lucas Mayfield, the president of the grassroots advocacy group Grassroots Wildland Firefighters, stressed that firefighters should not be held hostage to congressional infighting. He reiterated that a pay cut not only risks the workforce walking off the job this year but also poses significant recruiting challenges in the future. As a result, professionals may be inclined to seek alternative employment opportunities that provide stable and predictable income, potentially exacerbating the shortage of qualified wildland firefighters.
While the Democratic-led Senate seems poised to advance bipartisan funding, uncertainty ensues regarding the Republican-controlled House of Representatives. Internal divisions between hardline and centrist Republicans could hamper the timely enactment of spending legislations. With wildfires scorching nearly 1.8 million acres in the United States so far this year, the costs associated with fire suppression have been steadily rising. In 2015 and 2017, over 10 million acres were affected, and last year, the expenses related to suppressing wildfires surpassed $3.5 billion, based on data from the National Interagency Fire Center.
Representative Joe Neguse, a Democrat from Colorado, emphasized the inherent urgency of addressing the pay gap and worker livelihoods of wildland firefighters. Neguse, along with Senator Kyrsten Sinema, an independent from Arizona, introduced legislation in their respective chambers to prevent a pay cliff and authorize future pay increases. To safeguard the salaries of wildland firefighters, salary authorization must be included within short-term stopgap measures, special supplemental legislation, or annual appropriations, depending on the timeliness of Congress’s actions before September 30.